Addressing a few questions before shit goes down.
Kiyoko wrote:
Are you saying that everyone who has claimed/claims passive from now on is lying about their role? According to my list, 8 people acted and (not including me) that means that 6 people certainly did not act.
The only person who's claimed a "high-powered" role so far is you. Mine is pretty limited. I did say I'm effectively vanilla because I don't expect to live long enough to use it again.
Also hey, whatever happened to that possibility where someone sent in the NK, and it was protected against? I'm interested in you conveniently forgetting this possibility when it was your most-supported theory on D1.
I've wanted this Tet/Kiyo showdown for ages, let's do it.
I never said anybody who claimed or will claim passive is lying about their role, I'm not sure why you're going for absolutes here. I said that a passive role combined with the fact that the only person to vouch for alca has been you, is suspicious. It is. I am not the only person with votes on who I have votes on.
The scenario that I supported D1 is still valid and likely. Which I actually specifically said in an earlier post, other scenarios are still valid and likely. This is one of a few possibilities, and I need to make a vote. It's what I have to go on as the most plausible suspicious scenario. If you rather me pull a Tiki and vote for myself because "That guy is suspicious", I'm sorry I can't do that.
You chewing my head off about proposing a possible situation worth a vote (Read: Speculating) when it's been clearly established by you yourself that you'd be willing to vote "Just out of curiosity" and that's acceptable enough to you, that seems a little hypocritical to me. You're the one that asked me to come forward with information whether people believed it or not, I did, and now you're acting like this is a situation where I need to convince you. If it is, why did you ask me to say anything in the first place?
I am probably going to be the first person who will say my role is high-powered. I never denied that. I actually emphasized it. Is it so weird to correctly assume the game is high powered when there's two stunners right off the bat, Sammiya saying there's more, my role, and you who apparently can see everyone who acted? I think in such a small game it's pretty correct to call it that. I'm not even sure why that's a nitpick for you.
There's no Tet / Kiyo showdown to be had here. I opened the last post knowing I was likely going to be lynched. There's no subtext or grand plan to that. I can count, so I can recognize my number is higher than others.
Given that, this:
Kiyoko wrote:if that was supposed to convince me not to vote for you, I'm sorry, but I always lynch the miller claim on principle because it's just too fucking dangerous to keep around someone whose alignment can't be confirmed at all.
Is kind of not what I was going for at all. I said specifically that I accepted the reality of the scenario and I was dumping as much as I could before it happened.
You're either putting words and intent in my mouth or you're just skimming the post, either way I have no idea why you're still attacking after I've gone on record as saying "Well I'll likely die. Not going to try to defend myself anymore as it has already been decided. Here's information to help before I go.".
All speculation is good speculation, whether a person is mafia or town. I'm giving as much information as I can before I bite the dust so people can draw their own conclusions from it after what I said proves itself to be objectively true.
alcasync wrote:If anyone is afraid of voting for T3tsuya because they think he might be a bomb, I'd be happy to vote and unvote him to be the last vote on him, if it helps at all.
Likewise with this. I already said I'm not a bomb. A random person will be erased if I die before D4. Which seems to be happening.
After it happens, check backlogs.
When, not if, I am proven right, draw your own conclusions from how people reacted to my claims.