Oh my fuck so much has happened.
I see the Lucas / Luxaria mix-up regarding the 85% has been cleared up.
Now that Lucas has answered, I will clarify a few things, as well as address something ezz asked of me.
First off, yes, I am claiming that one of my quirks granted me the ability to block one player from receiving any quirks on that phase (night one). From rollover, it looks identical to what was used on Cure?* However, in addition to being jailed, I also used my particular variant on Lucas. So I don't know what to make of that.
Second, regarding the role duplication. The ability that was granted from the zalgo role effect... I actually happened to target Tiki with it. What I am wondering as part of my theory is if while the ability was negated as part of me being jailed... if there was a hidden component that infects those targeted with zalgo on top of the purported effect (or instead of). And since the jail says it lets through quirks, it's possible I may have still performed the quirk-giving part of the zalgo role ability. I have no idea.
Third, the reason I wanted to see Lucas' response to that question (re: how he knew there was an 85% chance of a bus in play) is because last night I had both a bus and a redirect as part of my four role effects. The presence of another role that might skew actions is potentially weird and unlikely to me?** Unless one of mine was a lie or inaccurate in some way.
There was one other power I had, but I will keep that quiet for now. But now you know three of the things. I think sharing this information is advantageous at this time. I hope it is, anyway.
* Edit: I double-checked. Mine says it specifically blocks quirks, clarifying that the target will not get new abilities in a flavorful fashion. The wording for the effect on Cure in rollover is curious.
I can't tell if that means what I described above, or if it is saying she may not be the recipient of any abilities, or she may not receive a role from another role that gifts them, or something else. So, make of that as you will.
** Edit: Actually, there could be another redirect in play, if mine was legit. The way it was worded might allow for a second redirection ability.
I see the Lucas / Luxaria mix-up regarding the 85% has been cleared up.
Now that Lucas has answered, I will clarify a few things, as well as address something ezz asked of me.
First off, yes, I am claiming that one of my quirks granted me the ability to block one player from receiving any quirks on that phase (night one). From rollover, it looks identical to what was used on Cure?* However, in addition to being jailed, I also used my particular variant on Lucas. So I don't know what to make of that.
Second, regarding the role duplication. The ability that was granted from the zalgo role effect... I actually happened to target Tiki with it. What I am wondering as part of my theory is if while the ability was negated as part of me being jailed... if there was a hidden component that infects those targeted with zalgo on top of the purported effect (or instead of). And since the jail says it lets through quirks, it's possible I may have still performed the quirk-giving part of the zalgo role ability. I have no idea.
Third, the reason I wanted to see Lucas' response to that question (re: how he knew there was an 85% chance of a bus in play) is because last night I had both a bus and a redirect as part of my four role effects. The presence of another role that might skew actions is potentially weird and unlikely to me?** Unless one of mine was a lie or inaccurate in some way.
There was one other power I had, but I will keep that quiet for now. But now you know three of the things. I think sharing this information is advantageous at this time. I hope it is, anyway.
* Edit: I double-checked. Mine says it specifically blocks quirks, clarifying that the target will not get new abilities in a flavorful fashion. The wording for the effect on Cure in rollover is curious.
Rollover wrote:Cure was blocked from receiving quirks and abilities.
I can't tell if that means what I described above, or if it is saying she may not be the recipient of any abilities, or she may not receive a role from another role that gifts them, or something else. So, make of that as you will.
** Edit: Actually, there could be another redirect in play, if mine was legit. The way it was worded might allow for a second redirection ability.