Hmm, just to elaborate on...
... this, what I was thinking when I said...
... is that my understanding would be that in this hypothetical, mafia looked at possible role claims that could be done on N0, determined ezz's needed to be creative (or whatever other scenario might prompt them for a ruse cruise), and decided in advance they'd throw this into motion if she was voted upon. I feel like given the close 1 hour and 30 minute timing between the two, it'd be more likely it wasn't a reactive thing. Because as Mitsu points out, there... would be no harm in just backing any number of uncertain lynches the thread was pushing. But if you pre-planned to have this out, consistency matters in this case. Though you could let an actual town!angel and maybe others be "cleared" by delayed use of your ruse to garner some good faith?
Under that perspective, given the position of the thread as Mitsu described it, a ruse does seem less likely if I'm honest. Plus whatever it's worth, I can see town!ezz doing as she claims: Staying quiet to get some activity votes on her, and then waiting to see if angel might share more information before publicly outing her involvement in angel's lynch. Granted, maf!ezz would be intending to appear as town!ezz.
So... back to probably? tailored? angel? Or wondering if ezz's role is legitimate. Could be a counter-balance to whatever Tiki's been raving about. Mitsu's right in that the power of outing many people does require a lot of things to fall into place. More realistically, usually if a lynch is going to form on someone, there's a trickle of 1-3 votes across the phase or phases, and then at that point a mafia might latch on or look pro-town following a town vote and get caught in the backlash of this proposed role--if they don't just start the probing vote themself. Like I said, high variance. It's just that the highest level of variance is what strikes me as really unusual in terms of game balance, but... everything else... I don't know.
Edit: This makes me really wish angel posted again before rollover to give us another lead one way or the other.
Mitsu wrote:I feel like maf!ezz would probably wait and see/test the waters first instead of throwing her entire weight behind this intermission + dealing with any potential fallout from the discrepancy between the interlude and Angel's apparent alignment in-thread, since by associating herself with this weird event that just happened she's drawn a lot of unnecessary attention to herself that she wouldn't have had otherwise. That being said, though, I fully admit that this could all be some kind of weird elaborate setup but this is a weird situation in general.
... this, what I was thinking when I said...
Luxaria wrote:However, if the role is fake then that would mean mafia planned for one of their own--ezz, in this case--to pull this claim while they fire off a fake interlude. Would you have a mafia vote on ezz prior to that to try and clear one, or possibly some other towns to get on their good side?
... is that my understanding would be that in this hypothetical, mafia looked at possible role claims that could be done on N0, determined ezz's needed to be creative (or whatever other scenario might prompt them for a ruse cruise), and decided in advance they'd throw this into motion if she was voted upon. I feel like given the close 1 hour and 30 minute timing between the two, it'd be more likely it wasn't a reactive thing. Because as Mitsu points out, there... would be no harm in just backing any number of uncertain lynches the thread was pushing. But if you pre-planned to have this out, consistency matters in this case. Though you could let an actual town!angel and maybe others be "cleared" by delayed use of your ruse to garner some good faith?
Under that perspective, given the position of the thread as Mitsu described it, a ruse does seem less likely if I'm honest. Plus whatever it's worth, I can see town!ezz doing as she claims: Staying quiet to get some activity votes on her, and then waiting to see if angel might share more information before publicly outing her involvement in angel's lynch. Granted, maf!ezz would be intending to appear as town!ezz.
So... back to probably? tailored? angel? Or wondering if ezz's role is legitimate. Could be a counter-balance to whatever Tiki's been raving about. Mitsu's right in that the power of outing many people does require a lot of things to fall into place. More realistically, usually if a lynch is going to form on someone, there's a trickle of 1-3 votes across the phase or phases, and then at that point a mafia might latch on or look pro-town following a town vote and get caught in the backlash of this proposed role--if they don't just start the probing vote themself. Like I said, high variance. It's just that the highest level of variance is what strikes me as really unusual in terms of game balance, but... everything else... I don't know.
Edit: This makes me really wish angel posted again before rollover to give us another lead one way or the other.