KFHAFhalkfhalkhfa
I meant to type 500... lmao
E; why do I pagetop ever
I meant to type 500... lmao
- Spoiler:
- thanks!! <3
E; why do I pagetop ever
Cry Wolf is a brand new forum focused on the forum version of the deception game Mafia/Werewolves
Five wrote:There were a lot of blocking actions in rollover for such a small game, don't you think?
Re:Five: this is true, but at the same time I wouldn't exclude the possibility just because of that, since unexpected behaviour along the lines of "nah she wouldn't do this if she were mafia" is a perfect cover for when you're actually mafia. Like how I wouldn't claim the intermission role in music maf before rollover, knowing angel would flip town, if I was mafia - but I was mafia. Not saying Five necessarily is, but I won't write the possibility off so easily. (And I voted her primarily to gauge her reaction, tbh.)Luxaria wrote:@ ezz
My gut reaction is similar to yours regarding Five, but I'd also like to imagine... if Five were mafia she wouldn't be so obtuse about it with her plans and comments. Which makes me think she has another reason for whatever she's saying, and I have ideas of what those reasons might be, but... that just confuses me even more.
For the record, I agree regarding Tiki... though being soft has burned me (see previous comments relating to Sam/drandahl). I'm just keeping my vote on him because I hate changing, especially when it won't accomplish much at this point.
Technically speaking, I have an idea why you might support claiming actions, but at the same time, I still think it doesn't really help us - regardless of the confirmation it gives us, it still paints them as a high priority target for the mafia, so it doesn't... really accomplish all that much. (Unless I'm missing your point, though I doubt it.)Perfectly Average Number wrote:If there's really nobody else who thinks this is a good idea, I must be mistaken about something.
If I could say more to justify why I think this way, I would.
There were a lot of blocking actions in rollover for such a small game, don't you think?
I mostly assumed it was for meta reasons, but if it wasn't, I'm curious about this too.high seraph wrote:@Rasei
what did you mean with "please don't vote Tiki yet"? You... were supposed to be stunned, so you shouldn't have learned any kind of information about Tiki and?? This just makes me really curious...??
Aeiou wrote:That was a pretty average d1 rollover as of late
I LIKE PICTURES
ezzelin wrote:I mostly assumed it was for meta reasons, but if it wasn't, I'm curious about this too.high seraph wrote:@Rasei
what did you mean with "please don't vote Tiki yet"? You... were supposed to be stunned, so you shouldn't have learned any kind of information about Tiki and?? This just makes me really curious...??
Oh I didn't mean meta reads from this game! I guess I didn't really phrase that well, or accurately, for that matter. I meant... other reasons not really solely pertaining to this game, or his activity in this game, but I might be entirely wrong tbh. I assumed more emotional reasons along the line of "let Tiki play for at least a phase" based on recent events, and since there hasn't really been any solid leads on the Tiki lynch.high seraph wrote:ezzelin wrote:I mostly assumed it was for meta reasons, but if it wasn't, I'm curious about this too.high seraph wrote:@Rasei
what did you mean with "please don't vote Tiki yet"? You... were supposed to be stunned, so you shouldn't have learned any kind of information about Tiki and?? This just makes me really curious...??
idk I don't mean to criticize but Tiki made like, five posts with very little substance in them, so I'm not sure what Rasei could've picked up on in terms of meta reads lol. All we know about Tiki so far is that he tried to act on N0 (and apparently failed?), and that he voted No Lynch for self-preservation, which is perfectly understandable. In fact, while I do think mafia might have contributed to the NL, I'm not holding Tiki or She-Ra as particularly suspicious since they had a legit reason to vote the way they did (Five voted NL before anyone voted for her, which is why I'm not including her in the "justifiable No Lynchers" box).
ezzelin wrote:Re:Five: this is true, but at the same time I wouldn't exclude the possibility just because of that, since unexpected behaviour along the lines of "nah she wouldn't do this if she were mafia" is a perfect cover for when you're actually mafia. Like how I wouldn't claim the intermission role in music maf before rollover, knowing angel would flip town, if I was mafia - but I was mafia. Not saying Five necessarily is, but I won't write the possibility off so easily. (And I voted her primarily to gauge her reaction, tbh.)
high seraph wrote:idk I don't mean to criticize but Tiki made like, five posts with very little substance in them, so I'm not sure what Rasei could've picked up on in terms of meta reads lol. All we know about Tiki so far is that he tried to act on N0 (and apparently failed?), and that he voted No Lynch for self-preservation, which is perfectly understandable.
Aeiou wrote:
and thats a really cute photo ;0;
high seraph wrote:oh my god i cant believe how frickin cute this host is, this is wAY ABOVE AVERAGE CUTENESS I DID NOT COME TO THIS GAME PREPARED FOR ABOVE AVERAGE CUTENESS tHIS IS A BREACH OF THE GAME RULES, SOEMOEN CALL AVERAGE MAFIA POLICE!!!!!!!!!
ezzelin wrote:HAYLEY YOU ARE A SHAM THIS IS NOT AVERAGE AT ALL YOUR CUTENESS BREAKS ALL STANDARDS OF AVERAGE GET OUT
Luxaria wrote:
By the way, Hayley.
- Spoiler:
You are lovely. <3
- Spoiler:
I'll give you even more hugs next time.
Ninfia wrote:EVERYONE IS MOD KILLED THE GAME IS OVER. U ARE ALL NOT AVERAGE ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum