okay so I'm alive let's do this
First, regarding the missing stun. I've already before suspected the double stun was either JOAT, roulette, or a blind copy, so I'm not at all surprised that there aren't two stuns again.
In all three cases, there are five notable possibilities:
a. JOAT/roulette/blind copy rolled/copied protect, and with the protect that saved vowels the previous night, saved both kill targets last night. Unlikely, but not impossible.
b. JOAT/roulette/blind copy rolled vig /copied the NK, and shot one of the kill targets last night. In the case of blind copy, I would encourage the person to claim their target for obvious reasons (though blind copy is admittedly far less likely than the other two possibilities).
c. JOAT/roulette/blind copy was stunned or jailed.
c. JOAT/roulette/blind copy rolled stun or jail and actual stunner or jailer was stunned or jailed, or
d. JOAT/roulette/blind copy rolled something that doesn't appear in rollover.
Listed in ascending likelihood, more or less. I... don't think there's actually much more to say about this that isn't pure speculation or even wishful thinking, though.
Regarding the two kill attempts, I'm inclined to think one of them was a townvig. Firstly, because I'm not sure how likely it is in this game size for maf to have a vig - and if they did, it would probably be VERY limited, in which case I honestly doubt they'd shoot it off so early. I'd expect a single shot or a conditional two shot at most, so even with the first NK failing, I don't think they'd use it so early in the game. Secondly, while it is also fairly early for a townvig, I can see it being someone who was worried of being killed or lynched early, and saw enough behaviour that they thought suspicious to attempt a kill. Thirdly, I think it's likelier that maf would have an intermission kill rather than a traditional nightvig, which rings more town to me.
The only thing that makes me doubt a little bit is that barring the first scenario for explaining the missing stun, one of the failed kills had to be due to a bulletproof, which is traditionally more of a town role versus lynchproof being more often granted to maf. However, there's still the possibility of just a full killproof (by which I mean survives n attempts on own life, where n is at least 1 but not larger than, say, 3), which would make sense for mafia especially assuming town vig.
In light of this, I think Lux is definitely far more likelier to have been the NK, and katagi a possible townvig target. I can see her mildly cryptic D1 posts pinging a potential townvig, and they might have thought it wouldn't be a big loss or an issue even if she ended up flipping town, since she admitted she will have difficulties following the thread. For lack of better target atm, I'd be down for a katagi lynch since even in the worst case scenario, it should shed some light on last night's rollover.
Also pinged by Rasei since she posted twice and did not respond to Lucas' question at all. I feel like a potential mafia team behind her would have notified her and prodded her to answer though, so I'm not gonna jump vote on her. Sending out signal in search of answer--
ezzelin wrote: high seraph wrote:@Rasei
what did you mean with "please don't vote Tiki yet"? You... were supposed to be stunned, so you shouldn't have learned any kind of information about Tiki and?? This just makes me really curious...??
I mostly assumed it was for meta reasons, but if it wasn't, I'm curious about this too.
My gut feeling also says Sammie's posting style sounds very much like how she sounds when she's mafia, but willing to give her the benefit of doubt for now since she hasn't played in a while.