So I guess this doesn't really hurt, but the theory I mentioned really early on in the phase that I wasn't sure was 100% correct was indeed the theory that if someone targets a player, the action resolves on whomever's role they have. This is because the Blaire thing felt really strange to me, and if this isn't the case then the second most plausible option in my mind is that Blaire was redirected somehow or Blaire was a miller killed by a vigilante. For what it's worth, if this is the case, it explains the claiming rule in this game.
I didn't out this theory immediately because I feel like some people, if mafia, would have caught onto this theory extremely quickly (that is, mafia would likely know if this is the case had they NK'd Katze) and I was wondering whether or not anyone would bring it up. For the record, if this theory is true, I'd feel like mafia wouldn't bring this theory up and push it as a plausible option because then it leaves town in the dark about what happens to their targets, but Tiki seems pretty convinced this is a thing and it's already out in the open.
The only kink in this theory is Kiyoko, who suggests that she specifically targeted a player and it got through on the intended player, rather than rerouted to another player? Unless whatever result she had doesn't confirm the eventual target's name.
Last edited by rautilus on Wed Sep 14, 2016 2:38 pm; edited 1 time in total