Indeed. We'd basically need to decide, as a group:
- Who we want to vote out, while not actually voting (aside from one person).
- Who the lone person should be to give the single, which gives them the gun.
Of course, I did forget earlier that who ever gets voted out gets a gun too. So there would be two guns in play, and we would know who would have both, with one of the gun owners no longer protected. It also means that, theoretically, we should have three kill attempts the following night phase.
Either way, there is one person who will get a gun tonight, and be weaker for it. The question is, do we put a second gun into play as well, given to somebody with full protection?
Edit: And thinking on it, we probably do want to have a group agreement about who should give a singular vote. Otherwise, we could run into a situation where a Mafia "forgets" to vote, giving the gun to a random player, in hopes it will go to one of the two voting Mafia, allowing them to fire anonymously.
(Though, on the other side, people forgetting, legitimately or not, would give us something to speculate on, along with knowing the pool of people who MIGHT have gotten the gun...depends on what we decide mitigates the most risk.)