This whole Miller debacle reminds me of the
Google Document y'all made for us then-noobs. It was always that that made me think to announce Miller early...though I did forget about the part in bold here:
MILLER
A miller is a role that appears as the opposite alignment upon investigation or sometimes death. Mafia who appear as town are sometimes called "actors/actresses" or occasionally “reverse-millers,” though “miller” is a general-use term. Sometimes, players who appear as the opposite alignment upon death are specified as “death-millers.”
A town that appears as mafia upon death is inherently anti-town, and honestly the most pro-town strategy is to claim miller and then let town kill you off. The exception is if you also happen to be a power role, in which case you’re best off explaining the situation upfront anyway and being open with your actions. There’s basically no way to claim miller after you’ve already been investigated and have the thread actually believe you.
I actually think about that doc every time Miller comes up.
And if Blaire DOES have a neat role to make up for a nasty downside, probably oughtta keep her around.
Besides all that though, I still have 0 inclination to vote for Mr. Alice. I've too often been in that same spot, doing what I thought was what everybody would want me to do, only to get piled on by the thread, leaving me to shrug stupidly the only response available to me. The biggest frustration from all that being how the thread then just chases itself in a circle, distracted, for better or worse.
Does that mean Blaire is Town? Not at all. But, I'd still rather not look at someone who's at least talking, and giving us something to discuss, vs someone who has done little, making me inclined to, say,
vote: high seraph.
(I'm sure I've been ninja'd, with how long this took to write at work, but I'mma post this, THEN back read.)