Um, okay. I'm going to cast out a vote:
vote: Sammiya
Ideally I would vote for Rasei because of the RNG'd vote (and that's pretty much the most concrete thing I can think of right now) but I am not feeling very comfortable creating a four way tie between Luxaria, Sammiya, Rasei, and a no lynch! So, um, I've already said I don't really want to no lynch, so it's down to Luxaria and Sammiya. Of the two I feel like Luxaria has been pushing more theories and generally being more proactive in terms of town, whilst Sammiya has expressed unease towards lynching but suspicion of Rasei, which I find interesting. I guess my issue with this is that this game doesn't have any way (in a role related way, I mean) to provide evidence towards Rasei being mafia or town other than... voting for them (and Rasei hasn't responded to suspicions other than saying it was reaction testing), but I guess we really don't have a lot to go off of, so. Uh. I guess the other incriminating thing is the locked part of her suspicion (that is, suspicion of Rasei for locking their vote on an RNG'd vote when locking votes doesn't apply in this game) but I also feel like if she had a mafia partner someone would have explained to her the error.
Uhhhh.
Hm. I'm going to explain my gut feelings.
I guess one of the things that has made me a bit uneasy is ... I am slightly suspicious at some of the people who've expressed vague responses to the direction of the lynch (or even if we should lynch at all) - or, rather, have expressed vague responses when being asked questions in the thread, such as saying that they're not sure or they don't know without giving a concrete answer. I think it would be really easy for mafia to give weak answers to questions or be roundabout to avoid accidentally saying anything incriminating that they can be punished for later on, but that's just my 2 cents. The issue for me is that it's hard for me to separate "Are you genuinely unsure of what's going on?" from bluffing unsure-ness.
I think what I mean to say here is that someone who adamantly pushes something (a lynch, whatever) is seen as more incriminating than someone who just kind of flows on by and gives non-committal answers because the former draws attention, and therefore mafia would prefer to do the latter. I've noticed a bit of the latter in the thread, which makes me uneasy.
Then again, the only thing I've actively committed on in this thread is that I would prefer a lynch over a no-lynch in this scenario, so.
:pale:
@Mr. Alice - I just have one question for you! I know you said you weren't sure earlier as to why drandahl was killed, but do you have a theory as to why they were killed, or do you think it was random?
Ah frick someone posted before me and broke the tie um
Last edited by nautilus on Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:58 pm; edited 3 times in total