Time to fire up that grill.
I promise none of this is personal or anything dran buddy, but I kinda gotta tear apart some things that really bother me about your posts here.
drandahl wrote:Also Cure was pretty damned at that point... if I were mafia, I'd probably try to keep her alive a little longer. Which is why I'm slightly sideglancing everyone who took advantage of the Blaire vote, even if I keep them in the Not Sure bucket for now.
I'm sorry but this doesn't make a lot of sense to me at all.
Why on earth would anybody try to keep Cure alive longer as mafia in that situation? Cure is a very active and strong player. Half of Blaire's posts are about food or running for Mayor of Burgerville. There is a noted difference in threat level to mafia between the two players in this game and it's not pushing the needle in favor of keeping Cure alive.
You have a clear situation where there is doubt cast on a very strong player who, like you said, was pretty damned at that point. That is a chance mafia would not ignore. I'd like to understand your thought process here.
T3tsuya wrote:How can you be concerned about Luxaria's timing of voting 34 minutes before rollover with good backup reasoning when you yourself voted a scant 12 minutes before rollover with a noncommittal start9. And at a point where it was obvious that start9 would do nothing?
Please don't just gloss over this one. I'd like you to explain this regarding your being concerned about Luxaria's timing when yours was much worse. Luxaria's Mr. Alice vote effectively was the same as your start9 vote as they both effectively meant nothing at the time of voting. You've only explained your start9 vote as she did her Mr Alice vote, but not the contradictory timing concerns.
drandahl wrote:
T3tsuya: As much as he's been active in discussion, it's been a lot of him defending himself. I do get where he's coming from in trying to start conversation early on, and I do think T3t's actions were potentially town-beneficial at first. Also claiming he bussed himself and High Seraph seems pretty in-line with a town aware of his own mortality. (Speaking of which, he seemed like a good maf target for last night due to his drive for conversation and his reputation. I Protected him in the event he was town and not maf, but I was really nervous in doing so since was quiet during the most of the night phase and only about 30% trusted him, on a scale from 100% distrust to 100% trust. I'm at a healthy 64% trust now.)
If you trusted me only 30% why did you protect me? That is really low and there are other targets that were likely to be NK'd. You say most of what I've been posting has been defending myself. While a lot of what I have posted did have to do with me being wary of people jumping immediately on the Tet is maf train, true, I also established that it was because of the random nature of the game and that I was the only one cleared of not sending a night kill.
But what bothers me about your protecting me while also saying you only 30% trusted me over how much I defended myself is that I clearly said this.
T3t wrote:I don't care who gets lynched so long as there's information to be gained, but it's to our advantage that we lynch someone. I still would think that way if all of a sudden everybody ignores the stun and leads a kill on me, at least then you can look at the people who were contending with me the hardest afterwards.
I said that I was not only ok with being killed if it led to information, it was after I encouraged someone being killed that phase. Anyone. Including me. I encouraged my own death.
I will give the benefit of the doubt and put it out there that your protecting me to drag out another phase of no kills and your wanting to start9 to do the same thing because you had no strong opinions meshes well with each other and reads anti-maf. It's not contradictory and I don't see a problem with those things alone, but several other things in your statements are really bothersome and I'd like it explained before I jump to a vote.
Kiyoko wrote:If someone is stunned and subsequently killed, both the stun and kill would appear in rollover.
I think this means the only possible solution is that nobody voted to stun, which kind of narrows down several possibilities.
Tiki The Troll wrote:
I love how this has (finally) settled in as my reputation in these games.
You say finally, but this was set in stone the second game I played with you.
Mr. Alice wrote:Also why would you put me on a bus w/ T3t I would just cry and pretend to not notice him please don't do that to me.
/brushes ur hair in mild distress
NOTICE ME, KOUHAI.