Okay, for my protect N0 I tried to calculate the most likely targets, and then the most likely candidate everyone would vote for, and then try to factor in how this would affect everyone's votes and target selection. At that point it gets exceptionally WIFOM, but I submitted a protect on a 50/50 between Ninfia and Cure and chose Ninfia. My analysis was loosely:
Tet: Would protect Cure. Uncertain on NK, but not likely to NK Cure and probably myself as well.
Cure: Would protect Tet. Uncertain on NK, but probably not NK Tet, Ninfia, and maybe myself. Also would probably keep drandahl alive.
Ninfia: Would protect Cure or Lux. Uncertain on NK, but probably unlikely to NK Rasei, Blaire, or drandahl.
drandahl: Would protect one of Tet, Cure, or Lux. Would NK one of those three as well.
Tiki: Would protect Lux, Ninfia, or drandahl, with a possible option of Rasei. Might not NK Cure right away, but probably Tet or Lux.
Rasei: Would protect Lux. Would NK one of Cure, Tet, or Lux.
Blaire: No one knows. I had the most difficult plotting her out.
So given all of this, I wasn't sure whether to anticipate around these reads on people or go for something else.
So Cure got NKed. If mafia were killing her, they'd only do so expecting someone else to get the majority protects. The only way Cure would get majority is if myself, Tet, and Ninfia all voted for her. I'm town but voted Ninfia, Tet was town and probably voted Cure, which leaves Ninfia. I could see Ninfia submitting a NK on Cure expecting her to not get the protect since she'd be one of the few to vote to protect her. This also depends on a read of there not being only two on another target (assuming I'd protect Cure).
I could also see Ninfia doing this considering I've previously displayed bias to protect Tet in other games of this nature. However, this is still making a large assumption. That said, if mafia did not have Ninfia, they would be hedging their bets against Ninfia, Tet, and Lux not submitting a protect on Cure (and favoring between the three of them, which wouldn't happen with Tet). So then they would have to get reads on the other players to determine which player would most likely receive the protect.
Again, drandahl and Rasei strike me as the most economical NKers along with Ninfia. I have less of a strong read on Blaire (and even Tiki) since I feel it depends on their mafia partners.
So then there were lynch votes. Hmm.
T3tsuya v. Luxaria
Luxaria v. Ninfia SETTLED OUTSIDE OF COURT
Luxaria v. drandahl SETTLED OUTSIDE OF COURT
Luxaria v. Mr. Alice SETTLED OUTSIDE OF COURT
Tiki The Troll v. Luxaria
Mr. Alice v. Rasei
Luxaria v. Tiki The Troll
Rasei v. T3tsuya SETTLED OUTSIDE OF COURT
drandahl v. Tiki The Troll SETTLED OUTSIDE OF COURT
Ninfia v. Tiki The Troll
Rasei v. no lynch
drandahl v. Mr. Alice
Mafia would know it was between myself and Tiki, two town. Rasei did a vote on Tet, but why not swap to one of the two to be more decisive on getting a town out. drandahl went Mr. Alice to encourage a 50/50. Blaire kind of voted Rasei before it came down to me vs Tiki, and then she never changed, so I don't know how to process that.
Then Tet dies. He's only likely to get protects from Cure, dead, and myself. So what mafia combination would outweigh the possible protects on him? Because there's the chance I'd protect him, and then you're hoping the remaining are scattered enough to not hit a majority of 2.
Thinking...
Reading drandahl's replies.