I'd have to get back to that whirlwind to process it, but from my perspective the only people with votes on them were drandahl (Lucas, Rasei), and Sammiya (katagi, drandahl). ezzelin and one or two others (at least katagi, I think) had commented they'd be okay lynching drandahl (as well as Sammiya and some others), and no one else was voting. So considering my reads said I'd be okay with a number of people including drandahl, figured may as well try that lynch instead of the one by people I trusted less (namely, was unsure about katagi, and it's awkward factoring in the vote of someone like drandahl vs Sammiya when I am down with lynching either). All the votes swung in as I typed up the post and then after it, so I'm still not sure how I feel about all those votes coming in during the last 15 minutes.
Tiki the Troll wrote:Why did everyone vote for him again?
Why didn't you vote at all again? Technically you have no right to throw stones at town when you didn't even contribute to any lynch targets. This arguably goes for Sammiya as well, but I know one of you had a bad end to your day, and the other was indisposed. So I am not trying to be mean or unfair here, but we need something from everyone, so I am probing this first and
hoping all the others will actually post.
Also, Tiki, so why are you leaning on katagi and Aeiou?
Tiki the Troll wrote:And because of that. reading into the Lux thoughts on Vowels and Katagi, coupled with their votes on Rasei (who tends to be an easy target to mislynch and get away with it), I'm leaning toward one, or both, of them.
Which thoughts of mine, why do you trust them, what are you reading into their votes on D2, and what are your thoughts on them following D3? What elevates them above the other players in your reads? If either or both flip town, who is mafia? Who are you looking at strangely? In that string of votes last phase, which ones seem out of place?
P.S. Hi, person reading this. You should probably
hit that reply button and toss in some thoughts. Particularly in line with the nature of the questions posed in the preceding paragraph, though it neither needs nor should be that exact set of questions answered.